In statements like “let’s take a break,” “perspective psychology,” and “a government of citizens,” there is a complexity that often escapes the popular media. However, as media develops with the convergence of social media and technological conglomerates harvesting newfound knowledge of brain functions, genetic dispositions, and artistic preferences, among other equally related things, there is also a trend newly discovered to elaborate the capabilities of social networks to encompass something that is more cognitive, that has direction, or even a form of psychological function. For all the meanings of the terms, these are not meanings that are merely indifferent.

The opportunity for the new convergence between chemical reality and technological reality, now in its infancy, but now also in a significant stage that I call the Visual Horizon or Informational Event Horizon, is currently that of the visual and other media — the known sciences. such as statistics and mathematics, which are nonetheless genuinely integrated with aspects of the human mind. These integrations or ‘impertures’ (a word I define as ‘implied opening or significant indentation’) have a potential for magic, not only because the media offers what is commonly called ‘media magic’ but because of the convergence before mentioned between the realms of media or media-chemistry—qua psychology—and brain science.

What I would like to do is open the door to psychological media, not like passionately making movies, or even cultivating media databases, or working on media processing applications, but instead the specifically magical application of uses of highly context-specific for the by the advantages of perspective. Also, I won’t let your imagination determine what I mean by magical means, perspective psychology, citizen as government, or taking a break. Instead, these terms will be reinterpreted to connote something more meaningful to the media. More significant reiteratively, in its own context of psychological perspective, citizen-as-government, taking a break or magical means.

First, consider the opening. To some extent, it has been overused. The media in general (I’m thinking of commercials during the Super Bowl) is based on a closed network of assumptions about what the consumer sees, hears and interprets. This closed set of assumptions is a function of the openness for the consumer. If it wasn’t open, if the consumer couldn’t take turns being an atheist, a bully or a president, his specific approach to the SuperBowl wouldn’t have the same appeal. Clearly there are other options, but it’s hard to get to them. In the case of the expression ‘take a break’, the SuperBowl offers one option, while determining a large fixed set of dimensions offers another alternative.

For example, in the context of complex media, what if ‘take a break’ is a user-defined ‘location’? This offers the possibility of expanding the psychological imagination about what it means linguistically (and, ultimately, what it means to the consumer). Also, what can be added to a location concept is that it does not have to involve the physical relocation of someone. It could be a change of information, images, or even chemistry. Furthermore, these location-replacing categories are interchangeable and interpenetrate. If the chemistry is a function of the images, the images can be used to simulate chemical location cheaply. These chemical locations are then assigned not only to the biological, genetic, and personality test quadrants of information, but also to specific media types.

Now let’s look at another example. “A government of citizens” can be translated in various ways, such as “population”, “centralization”, and “government as citizen” and “citizen as government”. However, what does this say about the media? This is not always obvious. But recently, social media has stepped in to provide a metaphor for social responsibility and public or citizen awareness. Clearly then, in this case there are three agents: [1] citizen, [2] technology, and [3] Government. The interesting factor is that citizen can mean technology offering specific applications that are a function of his or her own brain, and perhaps in that context he or she is the legitimate authority over a specific area of ​​intellectual property. This is like the citizen as self-government. In addition, the corporatization of the media institutes a kind of centralized government in highly mobile products, which may not even exist in the same country in which they were produced.

Interpreting what I take to be the relatively arid context I have described so far, the citizen-app-government paradigm can be further extended in the context of social media, where media is a function of neurology, image analysis, and intelligence. personality. . I am not referring so much to a government role for the media as to a great relativism about what it means to be a citizen of the media. Clearly, media doesn’t just alienate dysfunctions, it integrates functions, so there is an opportunity for government, media, and personal images to integrate in terms that can be parsed on a computer. This, in turn, means further systematization in the standard and extended meaning of images and other forms of media, not only to be embedded in the context of media productions, but also to be embedded in the context of computing functions. Beyond that, there is a recursive capacity to reintegrate ‘media functions’ into functional concepts of citizen and government, presumably as agents within the media.

The last term I initially mentioned was perspective psychology. Clearly, the openness here is through a convergence between variety as a spice and scientific advances that promote the functionality of media and systems. By turning this idea into a circle with ‘media functions’ and ‘user-defined locations’, it is implied that science itself is one of the standard media openings. There is also the implication that disciplines like science will be open to a lot of user-generated content, along the lines of social media. There is an opportunity for the use of crowd psychology combined with computer interpretation to produce functional results.

However, ignoring the science for the moment, there is a direct potential between the ‘media function’ and the concepts of psychology. Maybe the brand is not what I mean. Perhaps there is a different concept than the brand that would fulfill a function for social networks. For example, consider relativized brands. There have been signs of additional user-defined brands of personal products, particularly in that advent when users define entire systems for themselves (say, aesthetically, etc.). These systems that users define connote in their best form, real authorities in the media. Therefore, a number of conclusions can be drawn: [1] Media will have psychology locations, which are effectively defined by the user. If users don’t find that they can own these locations, they will find a way to delegate responsibility to someone else, including individuals, governments, or corporations. This is a true moment of social psychology. [2] Emotions, under the authority of psychology, will largely define the nature of the location and thus the information. consequence [3] The systems will be a function of the chemistry and, consequently, [4] Society will depend on meaningful media science.

Here I have outlined a number of different areas that may affect the future of media. These implications are metaphysical, but strangely localized. They are scientific, but very personal. They are technical, but they involve the world. Surely the future of the media will benefit from considering the kind of tractatus I have discussed, directing the media toward those specific problems that affect the integration of mind, matter, and politics. These are the areas where the future of social networks will affect.